PostgreSQL vs MongoDB: 2025 Comparative Analysis​

Image Source: unsplash

Comparing Key Features of Two Databases

Explore the differences between PostgreSQL and MongoDB in 2025.

If you want the best database for your needs in 2025, you should consider how PostgreSQL and MongoDB manage your data and workload. PostgreSQL, as an RDBMS, utilizes SQL to provide robust data integrity and excels at handling complex queries. On the other hand, MongoDB is a NoSQL database that employs a document-based model, offering a flexible data structure and faster access for de-normalized data.

As of 2025, PostgreSQL commands a 16.85% market share, making it the second most widely used open source RDBMS. Many large companies depend on PostgreSQL for mission-critical applications. Meanwhile, MongoDB continues to be a leading NoSQL choice for rapid development and projects that require adaptable schemas.

Quick Comparison

Feature Overview

When you compare PostgreSQL and MongoDB in 2025, you see two powerful database systems designed for different needs. PostgreSQL is a mature RDBMS that uses SQL and a relational model. MongoDB is a leading NoSQL database that uses a flexible document model. The table below gives you a clear view of their core features:

🌍 According to recent overseas comparison rankings, PostgreSQL remains a top choice for structured data and analytics, while MongoDB leads for projects needing flexible schemas and rapid scaling.

Key Differences

You need to understand the main differences between PostgreSQL and MongoDB to make the right choice for your project. Here are the most important points:

• Data Structure: PostgreSQL uses tables and rows, making it ideal for structured data and relationships. MongoDB stores data as documents, which lets you handle unstructured or semi-structured data with ease.

• Schema Flexibility: PostgreSQL requires you to define your schema before adding data. MongoDB lets you change your data structure on the fly, which is great for projects that evolve quickly.

• Query Language: PostgreSQL uses SQL, a powerful and widely known language for complex queries. MongoDB uses its own query language, which works well for document searches and updates.

• Scalability: MongoDB supports automatic sharding, so you can scale out easily as your data grows. PostgreSQL can scale horizontally, but it often needs extra setup and tools.

• Performance: If your application needs fast writes and flexible data, MongoDB gives you high throughput. PostgreSQL shines when you need complex analytics or strict data consistency.

• Security: PostgreSQL offers detailed row-level and column-level security. MongoDB provides role-based access control and field-level restrictions.

• Cost and Ecosystem: PostgreSQL is fully open-source with no licensing fees. MongoDB offers a free version, but advanced features and cloud services may require payment. Both have strong communities and many integrations.

💡 If you want strong data integrity and advanced analytics, PostgreSQL is a proven choice. If you need rapid development, flexible data, and easy scaling, MongoDB stands out.

You can see from global rankings and industry reports that PostgreSQL and MongoDB each lead in their own areas. PostgreSQL is often ranked highest for transactional systems and analytics, while MongoDB is favored for modern web apps and real-time data platforms.

Data Models: RDBMS vs NoSQL

Image Source: unsplash

PostgreSQL Relational Model

You work with PostgreSQL using a relational model, which means you organize your data into tables with rows and columns. Each table has a predefined schema that tells you what kind of data you can store. This structure helps you keep your data organized and consistent. You use SQL to interact with the database, making it easy to write complex queries and join data from different tables.

PostgreSQL, as an RDBMS, enforces strong data integrity. You define relationships between tables, such as one-to-many or many-to-many. This makes PostgreSQL a great choice when you need to manage structured data and ensure accuracy. Many overseas comparison rankings highlight PostgreSQL’s strength in handling complex queries and supporting advanced analytics.

Some key advantages of the PostgreSQL relational model include:

• Open source and free to use

• Faster performance for complex queries

• ACID compliance ensures data integrity

• Efficient memory usage on disk

• Supports JSON storage with full SQL capabilities

The table below summarizes the main features of the relational model in PostgreSQL compared to the document model in MongoDB:

📝 Overseas rankings often place PostgreSQL at the top for transactional systems and analytics due to its robust relational model.

MongoDB Document Model

MongoDB uses a document-based model, which means you store your data as documents in collections. Each document is a JSON-like object, so you can store different types of data together. You do not need to define a strict schema before adding data. This makes MongoDB very flexible and easy to use when your data changes often.

You can quickly add new fields or change the structure of your documents without worrying about breaking your application. This flexibility helps you move fast, especially in projects where requirements change frequently. MongoDB’s document model is ideal for modern applications, such as IoT, content management, and AI-driven platforms.

Here are some benefits of the MongoDB document model:

• Schema flexibility allows for rapid development

• Ideal for modern AI applications with document data

• Combines document storage with vector store capabilities

• Simplifies architecture with less overhead

Overseas comparison rankings often highlight MongoDB’s ability to handle unstructured data and scale horizontally across distributed systems. This makes it a top choice for real-time applications and projects that need to grow quickly.

Schema Flexibility

Schema flexibility is one of the biggest differences between PostgreSQL and MongoDB. In PostgreSQL, you must define your schema before you add data. This fixed schema enforces strong data integrity and helps you manage complex relationships. You get reliable performance for structured data and advanced queries.

In contrast, MongoDB gives you a flexible and dynamic schema. You can change your data structure at any time, which supports agile development. You can add new fields or types to your documents without downtime. This makes MongoDB a good fit for projects where your data model evolves over time.

The table below shows how schema flexibility differs between the two:

• MongoDB’s flexible schema allows for easy modifications and additions to data structures, which helps you develop applications faster.

• PostgreSQL’s fixed schema enforces strong data integrity, making it suitable for complex queries and relationships.

• Your choice between PostgreSQL and MongoDB affects how you model data, perform updates, and design your application architecture.

💡 If you need strong data consistency and complex relationships, PostgreSQL’s RDBMS model with SQL is a solid choice. If you want rapid development and flexible data structures, MongoDB’s NoSQL document model stands out.

By understanding these differences, you can choose the right database for your project. Overseas comparison rankings confirm that PostgreSQL leads for structured data and analytics, while MongoDB excels in flexibility and scalability for modern applications.

Performance

Transaction Handling

When you need reliable transaction processing, you want a database that can handle complex operations quickly and accurately. PostgreSQL stands out in this area. In recent performance tests, PostgreSQL outperformed MongoDB in transaction handling, especially for multi-document ACID transactions. You can expect PostgreSQL to be between 4 and 15 times faster than MongoDB in various scenarios. As your dataset grows and exceeds available memory, PostgreSQL’s advantage becomes even more noticeable. Many experts, including those cited in overseas comparison rankings, highlight PostgreSQL’s surprising strength in handling JSON-based documents. This makes PostgreSQL a versatile choice for high-performance transaction processing.

• PostgreSQL delivers faster multi-document transactions.

• Performance advantage increases with larger datasets.

• Handles JSON-based documents efficiently.

Scalability

You want your database to grow with your application. MongoDB offers strong scalability features that help you manage large-scale applications. You can use horizontal scaling with sharding, which splits large datasets across multiple servers. This lets you handle more users and data by simply adding more servers. MongoDB also provides high availability with replica sets, so if one server fails, another takes over automatically. With MongoDB Atlas, you get auto-scaling and elastic growth in the cloud, which means your database adjusts to traffic without downtime. Geo-distribution lets you store data in multiple regions, improving performance for users around the world.

• Horizontal scaling with sharding for easy growth.

• High availability through replica sets.

• Auto-scaling and geo-distribution with MongoDB Atlas.

Read/Write Speed

You need to know how each database performs under different workloads. The table below shows recent benchmarks comparing read and write speeds for PostgreSQL and MongoDB:

You see that PostgreSQL leads in update operations, while MongoDB excels in read speed and slightly outpaces PostgreSQL in insert operations. Overseas comparison rankings confirm these trends, showing that your choice depends on whether you need faster updates or quicker reads.

If you want the best performance for your specific workload, consider how PostgreSQL MongoDB RDBMS SQL NoSQL options align with your needs.

Query Language: SQL vs JSON

SQL Features

When you use PostgreSQL, you work with SQL, a language designed for structured data. SQL lets you create, read, update, and delete data using clear commands. You can join tables, filter results, and group data with ease. SQL supports complex queries, triggers, and transactions that follow ACID properties. This means you get reliable results, even when handling large amounts of data. Many overseas comparison rankings highlight SQL’s maturity and feature-rich environment, making it a top choice for applications that need strong data integrity and advanced analytics.

Here is a quick comparison of SQL and MongoDB query language:

Tip: SQL’s ability to join tables and enforce relationships gives you powerful tools for managing structured data.

MongoDB Query Language

MongoDB uses its own query language, often called MQL. You interact with collections and documents instead of tables and rows. MQL lets you search, filter, and update documents using JSON-like syntax. You can build queries in JavaScript, Python, or other languages, which makes it easy to integrate with modern applications. MongoDB’s aggregation pipeline helps you process and transform data, but it works differently from SQL’s GROUP BY. Overseas comparison rankings often note that MongoDB’s query language is simpler for developers who want flexibility and rapid development.

• MQL works well for unstructured or semi-structured data.

• You can add or change fields in documents without changing the whole schema.

• Aggregation uses a pipeline approach, which is good for many real-time applications.

Indexing & Extensibility

Both PostgreSQL and MongoDB offer strong indexing options to speed up queries. PostgreSQL stands out for its extensibility. You can add community-driven extensions to enhance its features, such as new index types or encryption tools. This flexibility lets you tailor PostgreSQL to your needs. MongoDB provides robust built-in indexing, but it does not support third-party extensions in the same way. Overseas comparison rankings often point out that PostgreSQL’s extensibility gives you more control and customization, especially for advanced use cases.

Note: If you need specialized indexes or want to extend your database’s capabilities, PostgreSQL gives you more options.

You can see that the choice between PostgreSQL MongoDB RDBMS SQL NoSQL depends on your project’s needs. SQL offers a mature, structured approach, while MongoDB’s query language gives you flexibility for modern, evolving data.

Security

Authentication

When you choose a database, you want strong authentication to protect your data. Both PostgreSQL and MongoDB offer several authentication methods to verify user identity. The table below shows the main options you can use in 2025:

You can see that both databases support modern authentication standards. PostgreSQL and MongoDB recommend SCRAM-SHA-256 for password security. You also get options for integrating with your organization’s identity systems, such as LDAP or Kerberos. Overseas comparison rankings highlight the importance of these features for enterprise deployments.

Encryption

You need to keep your data safe, whether it is stored or moving across networks. Both PostgreSQL and MongoDB provide strong encryption for data at rest and in transit.

• PostgreSQL: Uses SSL connections to encrypt all data sent over the network. You can configure SSL requirements in the pg_hba.conf file to ensure secure communication.

• MongoDB: Implements SSL/TLS certificates for encrypting data in transit between clients and servers. This also applies within ReplicaSet or ShardedCluster setups.

Data at rest means information stored on your devices or servers. Data in transit refers to data moving between your application and the database. Both types need encryption to prevent unauthorized access. Overseas comparison rankings often note that both PostgreSQL and MongoDB meet modern security standards for encryption.

Compliance

You may need to meet strict compliance requirements, especially in industries like finance or healthcare. Both PostgreSQL and MongoDB support features that help you achieve regulatory compliance. You can use role-based access control, audit logging, and encryption to protect sensitive information. Many organizations choose these databases because they align with global security standards. Overseas comparison rankings often mention that both databases are suitable for regulated environments, giving you confidence in your choice.

🛡️ When you select PostgreSQL or MongoDB, you get advanced security features that help you protect your data and meet compliance needs.

Cost & Licensing

Open Source vs Commercial

When you compare PostgreSQL and MongoDB, you see clear differences in their licensing models and costs. PostgreSQL is entirely open source. You can use it for free, no matter the size of your project. This makes PostgreSQL a cost-effective choice for organizations that want to avoid licensing fees. You get strong security features and full access to all capabilities without restrictions.

MongoDB uses a mixed licensing model. You can start with the free Community Server, which is open source. If you need advanced features or official support, you can choose a paid version. The paid editions, such as MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, offer extra tools and services for large companies.

Here is a quick comparison:

Overseas comparison rankings often highlight PostgreSQL’s cost advantage for businesses, while MongoDB’s flexible options appeal to teams needing both free and enterprise-grade solutions.

• PostgreSQL is always free, making it easy to budget for your database needs.

• MongoDB lets you start for free, then scale up with paid features as your project grows.

Cloud & Managed Services

You have many choices when it comes to cloud and managed services. PostgreSQL managed services give you 24/7 monitoring and optimization. This means you get continuous support and performance improvements without extra effort.

MongoDB offers several cloud options:

• MongoDB Community Server: Free and open source.

• MongoDB Atlas: Fully managed, paid service with usage-based pricing.

• MongoDB Serverless Atlas: Pay only for what you use, with automatic scaling.

• MongoDB Enterprise Advanced: Custom pricing for large enterprises.

With serverless pricing, you pay for the operations you run. This model helps you avoid paying for unused capacity. For example:

• Read Processing Unit: $0.10 per million reads (first 50 million).

• Write Processing Unit: $1.00 per million writes.

• Storage: $0.25 per GB each month.

• Backups and data transfer have separate costs.

Overseas comparison rankings show that both PostgreSQL and MongoDB offer flexible cloud solutions. PostgreSQL stands out for its predictable costs, while MongoDB’s serverless and managed options give you flexibility as your needs change.

You can choose the model that fits your project and budget, whether you want full control or a hands-off managed experience.

Ecosystem

Community Support

You benefit from strong community support with both PostgreSQL and MongoDB. PostgreSQL has a large user base that actively participates in mailing lists, forums, and user groups. You can find answers to your questions quickly because many users share their experiences and solutions. The PostgreSQL community also sponsors events worldwide, which helps you connect with experts and stay updated on new features.

MongoDB also offers a vibrant community. You can join forums, read tutorials, and access a comprehensive knowledge base. Many developers contribute to MongoDB’s resources, so you always have help when you need it. Overseas comparison rankings often highlight the active participation in both communities, which ensures you receive timely support and guidance.

• Active user forums and groups for PostgreSQL

• Comprehensive knowledge repository for MongoDB, including tutorials and best practices

Integrations

You can integrate both PostgreSQL and MongoDB with many popular development frameworks and tools. This flexibility lets you build modern applications with ease. For example, you can use Joystick with either database. The MEAN stack works well with MongoDB, while Meteor and Keystone also offer support for these databases. This wide range of integrations helps you choose the best tools for your project.

Overseas comparison rankings often point out that both databases offer strong integration options, making them suitable for diverse development environments.

Documentation

You rely on documentation to learn and solve problems. PostgreSQL provides freely available documentation, maintained by its community. You can find guides, tutorials, and reference materials for most topics. MongoDB also offers extensive documentation, including best practices and step-by-step guides. Both databases update their documentation regularly, so you stay informed about new features and changes.

• PostgreSQL’s documentation covers a wide range of topics and is updated by the community.

• MongoDB’s documentation includes tutorials and practical examples for developers.

When you choose PostgreSQL or MongoDB, you gain access to active communities, strong integrations, and helpful documentation. Overseas comparison rankings confirm that both ecosystems support your success, whether you build traditional or modern applications.

Use Cases

Best for PostgreSQL

You should choose PostgreSQL when your application needs strong data integrity, complex queries, or structured data. PostgreSQL works well for systems that require ACID compliance and advanced analytics. Many overseas comparison rankings highlight PostgreSQL’s strengths in handling transactional workloads and supporting analytical queries.

Here is a table showing where PostgreSQL excels:

You will find PostgreSQL especially useful in finance, analytics, and enterprise resource planning. Its ability to manage structured data and relationships makes it a top choice for these scenarios.

Best for MongoDB

MongoDB stands out when you need flexibility, rapid scaling, or work with unstructured data. You can use MongoDB for projects that require frequent changes to the data model or need to handle large volumes of real-time information. Overseas comparison rankings often place MongoDB at the top for modern web apps and real-time platforms.

You might use MongoDB for:

• Content management systems that model user comments and manage website content.

• Product data management in e-commerce, where flexible schemas support catalogs and inventory.

• Operational intelligence, storing and processing machine-generated data for analytics.

• Mobile applications that need to scale and handle varying data structures.

• Real-time data integration, combining information from different sources into a single view.

MongoDB’s document model and built-in sharding help you scale quickly as your data grows.

Real-World Examples

Many well-known companies rely on PostgreSQL and MongoDB for their core systems. For example:

• Reddit uses PostgreSQL to handle high request volumes and as a NoSQL-style data store.

• Capital One and American Express trust PostgreSQL for financial transactions and OLTP workloads.

• eBay manages customer data with MongoDB to deliver fast shopping experiences.

• The Weather Channel uses MongoDB for real-time analytics.

• Some organizations, like DZone, moved to PostgreSQL for better schema management and saw a 10x reduction in database size.

These examples show how both databases support critical applications across industries. Overseas comparison rankings confirm that your choice should depend on your data structure, scalability needs, and the type of workload you expect.

Migration

Switching Challenges

Migrating between PostgreSQL and MongoDB brings unique challenges. You face issues with overloaded columns or tables, which can lead to confusion and inefficiency. Sometimes, you add unnecessary columns, resulting in many NULL values. Missing foreign key constraints can cause problems with data relationships.

You also need to consider three major hurdles:

1. You must adapt MongoDB’s flexible schema to PostgreSQL’s structured format. This process requires careful planning.

2. You need to translate nested and unstructured data from MongoDB into relational tables. This step can be complex if your documents have many layers.

3. You must ensure accurate mapping of data types. MongoDB and PostgreSQL use different formats, so you need to check each field.

Overseas comparison rankings highlight that organizations often struggle most with schema design and normalization during migration.

Migration Tools

You have several tools and methods to help with migration. The table below summarizes popular options:

Tip: You should choose a migration tool that matches your project size and complexity.

Compatibility

Compatibility depends on your data model and schema flexibility. MongoDB uses a document-oriented model with a flexible schema. PostgreSQL relies on table-based structures with strict, predefined schemas. Migrating data involves exporting, transforming, and importing records. You need careful planning and thorough testing to ensure a smooth transition.

• You should approach migration with caution.

• Planning and testing help you avoid data loss or errors.

Overseas comparison rankings recommend thorough preparation for migration projects, especially when moving between different data models.

You should match your database choice to your project’s needs. Overseas comparison rankings show PostgreSQL works best for structured data, complex transactions, and analytics. MongoDB excels with flexible schemas and high-scale operations.

Consider performance, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. To start, compare your data models, check key constraints, and monitor performance after setup. This approach helps you build a responsive and efficient application.