# Oracle 26ai? A Complete Analysis of Oracle Database Version Lifecycles

I. Executive Summary and Strategic Context: Foundations of Oracle Database Lifecycle Policy

For enterprise application architects making critical technology investment and upgrade decisions, understanding Oracle Database’s lifecycle policy is fundamental. Oracle has shifted from its traditional annual release model to a dual-track release strategy—the Continuous Release Model—aimed at balancing enterprises’ need for long-term stability with demand for cutting-edge technological innovation. This model categorizes database versions into Long Term Releases (LTR) and Innovation Releases (IR).

LTR versions, such as Oracle 19c and the latest 23ai/26ai, are designed as stable foundations for enterprise production environments, offering the longest support windows, typically including five years of Premier Support (PS) and optional Extended Support (ES). In contrast, IR versions, like 18c and 21c, are for rapidly introducing the latest features and enhancements, but their support windows are strictly limited, usually offering only about two years of Premier Support and no Extended Support. The primary strategic role of IR versions is to allow customers to quickly test and deploy new features in non-core or development environments before committing them to critical production systems.

A. Core of Lifecycle Strategy: A Structured Analysis of Oracle’s Lifetime Support Policy

Oracle’s Lifetime Support Policy is the foundation protecting customer technology investments, structured into three consecutive stages: Premier Support, Extended Support, and Sustaining Support.

1. Premier Support (PS)

Premier Support typically lasts five years and is the most comprehensive phase of the support cycle. During this stage, customers receive complete maintenance and services, including major product and technology releases, full technical support, My Oracle Support access, the latest bug fixes, Security Alerts, Data Fixes, and Critical Patch Updates (CPUs). For regulated industries, the PS phase also provides crucial tax law, legal, and regulatory updates.

2. Extended Support (ES)

Extended Support is a paid service following PS, providing an additional buffer period for customers wishing to control their OS or database upgrade strategy. ES typically extends support for three years or more, continuing to provide maintenance, software upgrades, security patches, and bug fixes. However, Extended Support does not fully replicate all services of Premier Support; support for certain components may be limited, a point requiring high attention in strategic planning, especially evident with version 19c.

3. Sustaining Support (SS)

Sustaining Support is the final stage of support for Oracle technology products, theoretically indefinite. During this stage, customers can continue accessing Oracle’s online support tools, obtain pre-existing patches and fixes, and receive limited assistance from technical support experts. The critical limitation of Sustaining Support is that it no longer provides new bug fixes or security patches for newly discovered bugs or vulnerabilities. Once a database enters the SS phase, enterprises face significant security and compliance risks. Therefore, the SS phase is often seen as the final deadline by which an enterprise must complete its upgrade.

B. Lifecycle Distortion from Version Delays and Architectural Challenges

In the database domain, the complexity of lifecycle planning lies not only in the length of support but also in version continuity. The lifecycle of Oracle Database 19c has been significantly extended, with its Premier Support and Extended Support end dates postponed to the end of 2032. This extension is not accidental but results from Oracle canceling the planned releases of versions 20c and 22c, creating a long technological transition period from the mature 19c to the strategic 23ai/26ai.

This lifecycle distortion buys enterprises valuable time, allowing them to continue running 19c as an “ultra-long-term” stable version. However, it also accumulates potential technical debt because 19c is the terminus of the 12c series, the peak of optimization for traditional database architecture. The next-generation version, 23ai/26ai, marks a mandatory architectural shift—completely ceasing support for the Non-CDB architecture, requiring all databases to convert to the Multitenant Architecture (CDB/PDB). Thus, the extended lifecycle of 19c is essentially a time window Oracle grants customers for planning and testing this significant architectural transformation.

II. Key Long-Term Support Version Lifecycles and Downtime Risk Assessment

Oracle 19c and 23ai/26ai are the two core pillars for enterprise workloads now and for the next decade. A detailed understanding of their lifecycle specifics, especially regarding support limitations, is key to formulating a risk-minimization strategy.

A. Oracle 19c (LTR): Detailed Lifecycle Timeline of the Current Enterprise Cornerstone

Oracle Database 19c is the current most mature and stable Long Term Release. Its initial Premier Support was originally scheduled to end on April 30, 2026, but has been officially extended to December 31, 2029. Extended Support follows immediately, starting January 1, 2030, and ending December 31, 2032. This means that by purchasing ES, enterprises can continue running 19c and receiving critical patches for the next eight years.

However, for enterprises using 19c, understanding changes in patch delivery is equally important. Starting with the October 2022 patch cycle, 19c RURs (Release Update Revisions) are no longer provided for version 19.17.0 and above. Furthermore, after the delivery of Oracle Database 19c RUR 19.16.2 in January 2023, no additional RURs will be delivered for all platforms. Customers must rely on the more comprehensive RUs (Release Updates) to obtain subsequent fixes and features.

B. The Hidden Security Trap in 19c Support: Reduced Support Scope from 2027

Although the 19c lifecycle is extended to 2032, this does not mean comprehensive support continues until then. In lifecycle planning, it is crucial to note a key security and compliance limitation: official documentation clearly states that for customers running Oracle Database 19c, support will exclude the following components during the Premier Support period (from May 1, 2027, to December 31, 2029) and the Extended Support period (from January 1, 2030, to December 31, 2032): the BSAFE cryptographic library, Java or any Java-related products, and FIPS compliance.

This reduction in support scope poses a significant challenge for organizations relying on the database’s internal Java Virtual Machine (JVM) or those in highly regulated environments requiring FIPS (Federal Information Processing Standards) compliance. For financial, healthcare, or government agencies, the lack of security updates and compliance support for these critical components means the effective security lifecycle of 19c is substantially shortened after 2027. Therefore, enterprises dependent on these key components must schedule their upgrade to 23ai/26ai to be completed before 2027 to avoid unacceptable operational risks.

C. Long-Term Roadmap and Strategic Positioning of Oracle 23ai (LTR)

Oracle Database 23ai (AI Vector Search Database), evident from the change in version naming (from 23c to 23ai), highlights its strategic position as the next-generation Long Term Release, with its core value lying in deeply integrated artificial intelligence and vector search capabilities.

23ai offers a clear long-term support commitment, with Premier Support expected to last until December 31, 2031. The end date for Extended Support is currently To Be Determined (TBD) but is expected to provide over a decade of investment protection. More notably is Oracle’s planning for future versions: Oracle has announced that 26ai will be a Long Term Release version, succeeding 23ai. Customers will not need a full database upgrade or application re-certification; they can upgrade from 23ai to 26ai simply by applying the Release Update from October 2025. This model of continuous innovation and seamless upgrade significantly reduces the risk of adopting new technologies in the future.

Strategic Positioning of Innovation Releases (IR)

Innovation Releases like 21c play the role of risk assessment tools in the lifecycle strategy. Oracle Database 21c’s Premier Support lasts only until July 31, 2027, and it has no Extended Support. Its short lifecycle determines that it is unsuitable for core, long-running production systems. For AI technology researchers, the value of IR versions lies in serving as rapid “testing grounds” for new technologies, allowing quick integration of cutting-edge features like Blockchain Tables, JSON enhancements, and AutoML in new application development. This model helps reduce technical risk and uncertainty when the next LTR (23ai/26ai) is formally deployed.

D. Security, Compliance, and Financial Risks of Running Unsupported Versions

Once an Oracle Database version enters Sustaining Support, the risk associated with the lack of new security patches and bug fixes increases significantly.

1. Security Vulnerability Risk: Unsupported versions may contain known, unpatched security vulnerabilities, making them clear targets for malicious actors. This risk grows exponentially over time.
2. Compliance Risk: In industries with strict data protection requirements like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, using outdated software lacking the latest security features can lead to non-compliance with regulations such as GDPR, SOX, HIPAA, etc. Hefty fines from regulators and damage to brand reputation are direct consequences.
3. Rising Operational Costs: Running old versions incurs higher maintenance and operational costs. As versions age, finding DBA resources with skills for legacy versions becomes more difficult and expensive. Furthermore, old systems may be incompatible with new hardware, operating systems, or cloud infrastructure, requiring more time-consuming manual workarounds and experiencing higher downtime frequency.

III. Strategic Inflection Point: Technological Path Divergence and Innovation from 19c to 23ai/26ai

Oracle Database 19c and 23ai/26ai represent two distinct eras in enterprise database evolution. 19c is the culmination of optimization, maturity, and stability in traditional databases, while 23ai/26ai is a strategic and technological inflection point, marking a radical shift towards an AI-native, developer-centric, and converged database platform.

A. Mandatory Core Architectural Shift and Multitenant Foundation

19c is a flexible transition point, supporting both the legacy Non-CDB architecture and the modern Multitenant (CDB/PDB) architecture. This dual support offers enterprises an option for gradual migration.

However, starting with version 23ai, Oracle made a significant architectural decision: complete cessation of support for the Non-CDB architecture. This means all databases upgrading to 23ai/26ai must convert to Container Databases (CDB), and any upgrade path from a 19c non-CDB environment will include a mandatory PDB conversion step. This mandatory Multitenant architecture is the foundation of Oracle’s cloud-native strategy, laying the groundwork for the future Autonomous Database model by simplifying lifecycle management, patching operations, and resource isolation.

B. AI and Converged Database Revolution: AI Vector Search

In terms of AI capabilities, 19c primarily focuses on Oracle Machine Learning for SQL (OML4SQL), allowing data scientists to build and deploy classic machine learning models (like classification, clustering) inside the database using SQL APIs. While powerful, this still belongs to the traditional data science paradigm.

23ai/26ai represents a qualitative leap, with AI Vector Search (AI VS) at its core. AI Vector Search is the cornerstone of the database’s AI strategy. It introduces a native VECTOR data type, specialized vector indexes (like IVF and HNSW), and new SQL operators, allowing the database to search and query based on the semantic meaning of data rather than traditional keywords or structure. This functionality provides core infrastructure for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) applications. AI researchers can directly leverage AI Vector Search to connect Large Language Model (LLM) responses with an organization’s private, proprietary data, generating more accurate, context-aware answers while ensuring data remains securely managed inside the database. This capability eliminates the need to move data to external vector databases or LLM services, solving core performance and security/compliance challenges.

C. Major Enhancements in JSON Data Management and Developer Productivity

For rapidly evolving modern applications, especially microservices and multi-model apps, 23ai offers revolutionary improvements.

1. JSON Relational Duality (JRD)

19c already has advanced JSON support, but 23ai introduces JSON Relational Duality (JRD), aimed at resolving the impedance mismatch between the relational and document models. The core of JRD is that data is stored only once in relational tables, but developers can access and manipulate it as if it were a single JSON document, and vice versa. This unified view greatly simplifies application code, potentially eliminating the need for traditional Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) layers and reducing the demand for separate NoSQL databases, thereby accelerating development.

2. Developer Tools and Language Support

23ai/26ai aims to be a developer-centric platform. Through GraalVM’s Multilingual Engine (MLE), it introduces JavaScript Stored Procedures, allowing developers to write stored procedures and functions using the popular JavaScript language, not limited to traditional PL/SQL.

Furthermore, SQL quality and usability have been significantly enhanced, including the introduction of a true BOOLEAN data type, IF EXISTS syntax, direct JOINs in UPDATE and DELETE statements, and a predefined DB_DEVELOPER_ROLE to simplify privilege management. These Quality of Life (QoL) improvements significantly boost developer productivity.

D. Security Architecture: From Defense-in-Depth to Active Prevention

In security, 19c provides a comprehensive and mature defense-in-depth framework, with features like Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Oracle Data Vault. 23ai/26ai shifts the security posture from reactive detection to active prevention.

Its core innovation is the SQL Firewall, a major security feature embedded directly into the database kernel. SQL Firewall can inspect all incoming SQL statements and compare them against a pre-approved allow list of authorized SQL statements. It can block or log any SQL that is not authorized, thus providing built-in, kernel-level defense against SQL injection.

Additionally, 23ai/26ai introduces Immutable Tables, a technology that provides tamper-proof records; once data is written, it cannot be modified or deleted, which is crucial for audit logs and regulatory compliance.

IV. Engineering Practices and Challenges in Database Upgrade and Migration Strategies

Upgrading to 23ai/26ai, especially from older versions like 12c or 19c, involves complex engineering challenges and must follow officially recommended methodologies and toolchains.

A. Official Definitions and Methodological Basis for Upgrade vs. Migration

Oracle’s technical brief clearly distinguishes between an “Upgrade” and a “Migration.”

• Database Upgrade: Involves only modifying the data dictionary to be compatible with the new version of the database software. It does not affect data in user or application tablespaces; the physical size of the database has little impact.
• Database Migration: Applies to broader changes, often involving moving or modifying user data, such as changing server hardware, storage architecture, character set, encryption, or architectural conversion from Non-CDB to PDB. Because migration involves moving user data, the physical size of the database significantly impacts the migration project.

When choosing an upgrade or migration method, architects must evaluate several key factors, including the source version, platform endianness, the need to change character set or compression, and the project’s permitted downtime.

B. Oracle’s Officially Recommended Upgrade Paths and Toolchain

Oracle has clearly defined its strategic direction for upgrade tools: automation and tooling.

• Official Recommended Tool: AutoUpgrade: AutoUpgrade is currently the simplest and Oracle-recommended upgrade method. It offers automation, supports concurrent upgrades, provides comprehensive restart capability, and parallelization, working across all operating systems and RAC environments.
• Mandatory Tooling: With the release of 23ai, Oracle has deprecated the traditional command-line upgrade tool (catctl.pl/dbupgrade) and the graphical Database Upgrade Assistant (DBUA), mandating the use of the AutoUpgrade tool. This move is a clear signal of integrating database management processes into DevOps practices, ensuring the repeatability and scriptability of the upgrade process.
• Direct Upgrade Paths: Versions 19c (19.3+) and 21c (21.3+) support direct upgrades to 23ai/26ai. For older versions, such as 11g R2, one must first upgrade to a version supporting direct upgrade (like 19c) or use a data migration method.

C. Comparative Analysis of Major Upgrade/Migration Methods

1. Advantages of AutoUpgrade Tool: The core value of AutoUpgrade lies in automation and minimized downtime. It supports a Refreshable Clone variant, allowing data to be copied in the background, thus minimizing downtime while retaining the source database for quick rollback. Furthermore, it can automate the mandatory conversion step from Non-CDB to PDB.
2. Full Transportable Export/Import (FTTI): FTTI is suitable for migrations from older versions like 11.2.0.4 and can support cross-platform migration, provided the RMAN CONVERT command is used to change tablespace endianness. It is faster than Data Pump but lacks flexibility for complex data format changes.
3. Oracle Data Pump Export/Import: Data Pump is the most flexible migration method, allowing data transformation during the import process, such as changing the character set, implementing encryption or compression, or altering LOB types. If the migration project involves adjustments to data layout or format, Data Pump is the necessary choice, although it may be slower than AutoUpgrade.

D. Migration Challenges and Compatibility Considerations from 19c to 23ai

The challenges in migrating to 23ai/26ai focus primarily on compatibility, performance, and data integrity. Due to changes in SQL optimization, deprecated features, and system parameters, the functionality of existing applications might be affected.

• Key Challenge: The biggest architectural challenge lies in the mandatory Non-CDB to CDB conversion. Although AutoUpgrade can automate this process, it represents a significant change in core architecture requiring meticulous testing.
• Risk Mitigation: Architects should use tools provided by Oracle, like the Database Pre-Upgrade Information Utility, to conduct comprehensive assessments to identify potential issues and required application modifications. Furthermore, database schema migration must be accompanied by thorough testing to ensure data structures and application logic remain intact.

V. The Future of Oracle Database: Autonomous Database and Cloud-Native Strategy

The ultimate goal of Oracle’s continuous innovation and version lifecycle evolution is the Autonomous Database (ADB). ADB represents the ultimate SaaS-ification of database lifecycle management, aiming to realize the vision of Self-Driving, Self-Securing, and Self-Repairing databases.

A. Comprehensive Autonomous Capabilities of Autonomous Database (ADB)

In the ADB model, traditional database administration tasks are taken over by automated systems.

• Self-Driving Operations: ADB uses machine learning-driven automation for performance optimization, SQL tuning, resource provisioning, and automatic index creation. It eliminates the need for manual intervention, ensuring continuous performance optimization and resource allocation.
• Self-Securing: ADB embeds security management into the database kernel through automated vulnerability detection, zero-downtime security patching, and ML-driven configuration hardening. For the ADB-Serverless model, all decisions regarding firmware, OS, storage, network, and database software updates are entirely delegated to Oracle.
• Self-Repairing High Availability: ADB ensures continuous availability and disaster recovery through continuous automated backups, point-in-time recovery capabilities, and a zero-downtime update process based on rolling updates and active-active architecture.

B. Strategic Transformation and Value-Add of the DBA Role

Autonomous Database significantly changes the role of the Database Administrator (DBA). As infrastructure-level tasks (patching, backups, tuning) are automated, DBAs are freed from repetitive, tedious labor.

The DBA’s role must transform towards application-level management and strategic functions. These value-added functions include application performance analysis, schema design, data migration strategy, compliance auditing, cost optimization, and most importantly—helping developers and researchers fully leverage the database’s converged data capabilities (like AI Vector Search, Graph, JSON) for business enablement. ADB pushes the DBA to become a strategic partner to the business and application architecture, rather than an infrastructure maintainer.

C. Strategic Value of ADB in Research and Modern Applications

For AI technology researchers, the value of ADB lies in its ability to let them focus all research efforts on data analysis and insight, without being distracted by database availability, patching, and resource scaling tasks.

ADB supports a comprehensive set of converged data models, including structured data, JSON, spatial data, text, graph, and blockchain. This allows researchers to handle complex multi-model data on a single platform, eliminating the need for integrating and moving data between multiple database systems.

D. Continuous Update Stream: The Ultimate SaaS-ification of Lifecycle Management

In the ADB-Serverless model, the traditional concept of a “version lifecycle” is replaced by a “Continuous Update” stream. Customers no longer need to plan major upgrade windows or bear Extended Support costs. This model represents the minimization of database operational risk and the rapid adoption of the latest AI capabilities. For organizations seeking maximum operational efficiency and minimum operational risk, ADB is a more disruptive long-term strategic choice than on-premises LTR versions.

VI. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations for Senior Researchers

A. Summary of Strategic Positioning for Key Versions

• Oracle 19c: Although support is extended to 2032, its strategic position is that of a transitional, highly stable terminal version. Enterprises must recognize the risk of Java/FIPS support exclusion after 2027 and use it as a countdown for architectural modernization planning.
• Oracle 23ai/26ai: This is Oracle Database’s future platform and strategic inflection point. It mandates architectural (Multitenant) modernization and, through innovations like AI Vector Search and JSON Relational Duality, directly embeds AI capabilities into the data layer, making it the foundation for building next-generation intelligent, converged applications.

B. Upgrade Path Recommendations for AI Technology Researchers

For AI technology researchers and architecture teams responsible for innovative application development, the following strategy is recommended:

• Avoid Innovation Releases (IR): IR versions like 21c have excessively short lifecycles and are unsuitable for long-term investment. Skip 21c and focus resources on the latest Long Term Release.
• Immediately Plan Migration to 23ai/26ai: If the goal is to build modern applications involving LLMs, RAG, JSON documents, or Graph models, the technological capabilities of 19c are a bottleneck. Initiating migration to 23ai/26ai is essential to leverage its native AI Vector Search and JRD capabilities.
• Leverage Automation Tools to Reduce Risk: Upgrade planning must center on the mandatory Non-CDB to CDB conversion. Utilize the automation and Refreshable Clone functionality of the AutoUpgrade tool to achieve a repeatable, low-downtime upgrade process and minimize rollback risk.

C. Future Trend Predictions: AI, Converged Data Models, and Full Autonomy

The future Oracle ecosystem will revolve around three core trends:

1. Acceleration of Data Convergence: Technologies like JSON Relational Duality will drive enterprises to consolidate all data models (relational, document, graph, vector) onto a unified database platform, significantly reducing integration costs and data silo risks.
2. Embedding of AI Capabilities: The database is transforming from a pure data storage system into an AI execution layer. AI Vector Search is the vanguard of this trend; future database versions will more deeply integrate LLM and generative AI capabilities with the data layer, making data more semantically understandable.
3. Full Autonomy: The Autonomous Database model will become mainstream. Enterprises will seek to fully outsource database operations to automated systems, allowing IT teams to focus on strategic innovation and business development rather than tedious maintenance tasks. This trend fundamentally redefines database lifecycle management and risk minimization.

Recommended reading

• SQL Optimization Course
• SQL optimization knowledge
• Database industry knowledge

What is SQLFlash?

SQLFlash is your AI-powered SQL Optimization Partner.

Based on AI models, we accurately identify SQL performance bottlenecks and optimize query performance, freeing you from the cumbersome SQL tuning process so you can fully focus on developing and implementing business logic.

How to use SQLFlash in a database?

• SQLFlash + MySQL

• SQLFlash + PostgreSQL