6 Best Managed PostgreSQL: AWS vs Azure vs GCP vs Supabase — 2026

If you’re choosing a managed PostgreSQL in 2026, the fastest path to a good decision is to model Total Cost of Ownership first (compute, storage, backups, and network egress), then sanity‑check performance ceilings (throughput, concurrent connections, IOPS/throughput), and finally confirm high availability, PITR, and security fit. This guide compares AWS RDS and Aurora, Azure Database for PostgreSQL Flexible Server, Google Cloud SQL and AlloyDB, and Supabase Managed Postgres with a developer‑experience lens and links to authoritative docs.

Quick side-by-side summary: AWS vs Azure vs GCP vs Supabase PostgreSQL

Pricing and TCO patterns that actually matter

TCO swings on a few levers you can control:

• Compute sizing and commitment: Right-size vCPU/RAM or ACUs and consider committed use/Reserved terms. Oversizing for peak can double or triple your bill; use pooling and caches to keep cores down.
• Storage type and performance dials: You pay for capacity and sometimes for provisioned IOPS/throughput. Match volume type to workload (e.g., gp3 vs io2 on AWS; Premium SSD v2 on Azure) and avoid overprovisioning.
• Backups and retention: Snapshots and PITR storage beyond included quotas accrue per-GB-month charges. Longer retention for compliance has a real cost.
• Network egress and cross-zone/region replication: HA across zones and especially across regions increases data transfer. Reporting/analytics pulling large datasets out of your VPC can dwarf compute costs.

Provider patterns and where to look in docs:

• AWS RDS for PostgreSQL: Storage choices (gp3, io1/io2, io2 Block Express) and their IOPS/throughput envelopes are central to both performance and cost; see Amazon RDS storage guidance in the official documentation for details and limits in 2026: Amazon RDS storage types, size, IOPS, and throughput.
• Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL: The shared, multi-AZ storage layer changes cost/perf calculus (compute and storage billed separately). Serverless v2 adds fine-grained scaling with min/max capacity and auto-pause. For architecture and reliability background, review Aurora storage architecture and reliability.
• Azure PostgreSQL Flexible Server: Premium SSD v2 lets you dial capacity, IOPS, and throughput independently within bounds—useful for TCO control. Learn how Azure models these dials in the service docs: Premium SSD v2 storage for Azure Database for PostgreSQL Flexible Server.
• Google Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL: Pricing combines machine shape, storage, backups, and an optional Regional HA configuration. Start with the availability model to see when Regional makes sense: Cloud SQL availability and HA options.
• Google AlloyDB for PostgreSQL: Costs emphasize primary/replica compute and storage with performance features (read pools, cross-region replicas). When modeling DR, include cross-region replication traffic and backup storage using AlloyDB’s docs as reference; start with AlloyDB cross-region replication overview.
• Supabase Managed Postgres: Plans bundle compute/storage/egress quotas, with overage rates for storage and network. For planning, read their usage model: Supabase compute usage and plan quotas.

Practical tip: build a small spreadsheet per workload with four lines—compute, storage (capacity and IOPS/throughput if applicable), backup storage, and egress/cross-zone traffic. Use a single region for apples-to-apples, then layer multi‑AZ or cross‑region as a scenario toggle.

Performance ceilings in practice (throughput, connections, IO)

Here’s the deal: most production Postgres workloads bottleneck on storage latency/throughput and connection management long before raw CPU. Treat “Postgres IOPS comparison” as a storage configuration exercise rather than a vendor arms race.

• Throughput and latency: Faster volumes (and larger ones, due to higher baseline throughput) can lift TPS with lower tail latency. But available throughput often depends on both volume settings and instance networking/storage limits.
• Concurrent connections: Postgres doesn’t love thousands of idle connections; use pooling (e.g., RDS Proxy, Cloud SQL’s managed PgBouncer, or Supabase’s Supavisor) to map many app sessions to fewer backends. Tune max_connections, work_mem, and pgbouncer modes to avoid memory pressure.
• IO characteristics: For write-heavy OLTP, provision IOPS to keep storage queue depth healthy. For read-heavy workloads, read replicas and query caching can reduce IO pressure.

Evidence anchors worth skimming:

• AWS RDS storage limits and characteristics (IOPS/throughput envelopes, volume sizes) are documented in the RDS storage guide: RDS storage types and performance characteristics.
• Azure Flexible Server describes how Premium SSD v2 capacity, IOPS, and throughput interact and how to scale them without downtime: Azure Premium SSD v2 for PostgreSQL Flexible Server.
• Cloud SQL’s managed connection pooling reduces backend connection churn and helps stabilize memory usage: Managed connection pooling for Cloud SQL (PgBouncer).

Provider-by-provider notes

Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL

Best for teams that want a familiar, cost-balanced managed Postgres with knobs for storage performance and connection pooling. TCO hinges on instance class, gp3 vs io1/io2, and Multi‑AZ. Performance scales with the right EBS choice and instance family; for very demanding I/O, io2 Block Express can deliver high IOPS/throughput when paired with capable instances. For limits and tuning points, consult the canonical storage guide: Amazon RDS storage types, size, IOPS, and throughput.

HA and backups: Multi‑AZ provides automatic failover within a Region. Automated backups and snapshots enable restores; configure retention to meet RPO/RTO goals and watch snapshot storage growth. Security features include encryption at rest and in transit via AWS KMS and TLS, plus parameter groups for auditing.

Developer experience: RDS Proxy helps manage bursty connection patterns; Parameter Groups and Extensions list are solid; integration with AWS IAM and networking is mature.

Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL

Best for high availability and global read scaling. Aurora’s distributed storage replicates across three AZs, lowering blast radius for single‑AZ disruptions. Serverless v2 lets you constrain min/max capacity and now supports auto‑pause, aligning spend to actual usage; see the architecture primer: Aurora storage architecture and reliability.

HA and global: Aurora clusters are Multi‑AZ by design, with fast failover. Global Database adds cross‑Region read replicas and controlled failover for DR. Backups and PITR integrate with AWS Backup; plan for backup storage beyond primary size.

Performance and connections: Reader endpoints simplify scale‑out reads. Serverless min ACU settings influence max_connections and scaling responsiveness; set them to fit connection demands during busy periods.

Developer experience: Smooth replica management, logical replication support, and familiar Postgres extensions. Keep an eye on data transfer if you rely on Global Database.

Azure Database for PostgreSQL — Flexible Server

Best for Azure‑centric teams that want straightforward ops and fine control over storage cost/perf. Premium SSD v2 lets you adjust capacity, IOPS, and throughput independently within supported bounds, a helpful TCO lever; see the service doc: Premium SSD v2 storage for Azure Database for PostgreSQL Flexible Server.

HA and backups: Zone‑redundant HA protects within a Region; planned/unplanned failover behaviors and maintenance windows are clearly described in Azure reliability docs. PITR retention is configurable; watch backup storage growth when plan limits are exceeded.

Performance and connections: Use connection pooling with PgBouncer or language‑native pools. Check the Azure limits page for connection and vCore guidance when sizing.

Developer experience: ARM/Bicep/Terraform support, Azure Monitor integration, and private networking via VNets. Extensions coverage is solid for common use cases (PostGIS, pg_cron, etc.).

Google Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL

Best for simplicity, with managed connection pooling and a clean admin experience. For reliability-sensitive apps, choose the Regional HA setting that spans zones within a Region; Google documents the model here: Cloud SQL availability and HA options.

HA and backups: Regional HA automates failover; backup features include on-demand backups and PITR options. For DR, consider read replicas and export/backup workflows.

Performance and connections: Managed PgBouncer helps with high connection fan‑out and language frameworks that open many short‑lived sessions. Storage performance scales with size and type; profile IO to avoid overcommitting cores.

Developer experience: Tight integration with GKE/Cloud Run, IAM database authentication, and a stable API/CLI. Straightforward migration paths from self‑managed Postgres using logical replication.

Google AlloyDB for PostgreSQL

Best when you need performance headroom and read scaling beyond typical managed Postgres. AlloyDB supports read pools and cross‑Region replicas; plan your DR topology and inter‑region data transfer by starting with this overview: AlloyDB cross‑region replication overview.

HA and backups: Regional HA with rapid failover; robust backup options, including enhanced backups and PITR. Align retention with compliance and storage budget.

Performance and connections: Designed for high throughput and low latency; read pools let you scale reads horizontally. Still apply pooling for application connection storms.

Developer experience: Familiar PostgreSQL compatibility, growing extension support, and Terraform provider coverage. Confirm version policy and maintenance windows for your release cadence.

Supabase Managed Postgres

Best for product teams that want to ship fast with a developer‑first stack. Supabase bundles Postgres with auth, storage, functions, and an integrated pooling layer (Supavisor). For plan behavior, quotas, and what scales with usage, see the platform guide: Supabase compute usage and plan quotas.

HA and backups: Features like PITR and HA vary by plan and region; confirm retention and replica options in the dashboard for production workloads.

Performance and connections: Supavisor offers transaction/session pooling modes; pick based on ORM behavior and transaction lifetimes. For high‑churn traffic, keep an eye on pool sizing and app timeouts.

Developer experience: Quick provisioning, generous defaults for early stages, and first‑class TypeScript tooling. Great for prototypes to mid‑scale products; audit plan limits as you grow.

Which should you pick for your workload?

• You optimize for TCO and standard enterprise controls: Start with AWS RDS for PostgreSQL or Azure Flexible Server. Use pooled connections, moderate IOPS volumes, and Multi‑AZ/zone‑redundant HA. Add read replicas only when query pressure merits it.
• You need high availability at scale with global reads: Consider Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL. Use Serverless v2 for spiky traffic and Global Database for cross‑Region DR, budgeting for replication traffic.
• You want managed simplicity on Google Cloud: Cloud SQL’s Regional HA plus managed PgBouncer fits most app backends. Keep backups lean with lifecycle rules.
• You expect sustained high throughput and many read replicas: AlloyDB’s read pools and HA are designed for this. Validate latency and egress costs early with a staging load test.
• You’re shipping fast with a lean team: Supabase accelerates delivery with an integrated platform. Confirm HA/PITR fit for your stage and set observability alerts around connections and storage.

Two evergreen tactics improve outcomes regardless of vendor:

• Keep connections under control with pooling and graceful backoff to protect memory and worker slots.
• Treat storage configuration as performance budget: right-size capacity, IOPS, and throughput before upgrading cores.

Methodology and sources

Scope and weighting: We prioritized Total Cost of Ownership (compute, storage, backups, egress), then availability and data safety (Multi‑AZ/Regional HA, PITR), then performance ceilings (throughput, concurrent connections, I/O), and finally developer experience. Pricing and limits vary by Region and change frequently; always validate with the provider’s calculator and current documentation.

Authoritative references cited above:

• AWS RDS storage characteristics for cost and performance modeling: Amazon RDS storage guide
• Aurora architecture and reliability background: Aurora storage architecture and reliability
• Azure storage tuning knobs for Flexible Server: Premium SSD v2 for Azure PostgreSQL Flexible Server
• Cloud SQL HA model and Regional setting: Cloud SQL availability
• AlloyDB cross‑Region replication and DR: AlloyDB cross‑region replication
• Supabase usage and plan behavior: Supabase compute usage

Assumptions: We avoided quoting static hourly/GB prices to prevent staleness and focused on configuration levers that drive bills and performance. For benchmarks, treat any vendor claims as starting points and run pgBench/HammerDB against your schema and query mix with connection pooling enabled.

Recommended reading

• SQL Optimization Course
• SQL optimization knowledge
• Database industry knowledge

What is SQLFlash?

SQLFlash is your AI-powered SQL Optimization Partner.

Based on AI models, we accurately identify SQL performance bottlenecks and optimize query performance, freeing you from the cumbersome SQL tuning process so you can fully focus on developing and implementing business logic.

How to use SQLFlash in a database?

• SQLFlash + MySQL

• SQLFlash + PostgreSQL